About

I come from a family of educators and farmers. My grandfather, my mother, and my extended family have spent their careers in education. Our family also runs a farm and a smart agriculture and aquaculture IT company. Growing up between these two worlds, teaching and feeding, I learned early that the work worth doing is work that helps other people.

My father, a first-generation computer engineer with a Ph.D. in environmental engineering, showed me early how technology applies to real-world systems. Through his work leading a smart agriculture and aquaculture IT company, I saw how AI was beginning to change food production. That pulled me from a general curiosity about the brain into a specific one: how computers learn from data. I studied computer science, built vision systems that automate feeding and growth monitoring in fish farms, and kept asking the same question, if the AI works, what happens to the data it depends on?

The answer led me to infrastructure. Agricultural data crosses farms, labs, advisors, and regulators, but once a file leaves one system, its history is lost. No one downstream can confirm where it came from or what happened to it. I spent the next four years building DEMETER, a platform that lets organizations share data while keeping a verifiable, traceable record that no single party controls, and the independent research behind each layer: who registered the file, what was done to it, and how it was shared.

Eleven years in, the thread has not changed. I build systems that solve real data problems and keep them working reliably over time, and now that the skills are ready, I am looking for roles, in industry or academia, where I can lead that work: finding the hard problems, building what is needed, and making it useful to the people who depend on it. I am grateful to every advisor, mentor, and community that made this path possible.

Technical Skills

Backend & DistributedHyperledger Fabric, Go, Node.js, Express, REST APIs, gRPC
Data & PipelinesApache Airflow, Apache Spark, Apache Kafka, PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB, CouchDB, Firebase
Cloud & DevOpsAWS, Azure, Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD (GitHub Actions), Git, Linux
Applied AI & VisionLLM Integration, PyTorch, YOLO, SAM, OpenCV
FrontendNext.js, React, TypeScript
LanguagesPython, Go, JavaScript, Java, C, C++, R

Education

University of Florida

Aug 2022 – Expected Aug 2026

Ph.D. in Agricultural and Biological Engineering · GPA: 3.95/4.0

Certificate in Biological Systems Modeling

Data Infrastructure, Distributed Ledger Systems, Verification Architectures, Reusable Data Assets, LLM Interfaces

Texas Tech University

Aug 2015 – Jul 2022

B.S. in Computer Science, Minor in Mathematics · GPA: 3.8/4.0

Computer Vision, Object Detection, Image Segmentation, Data Visualization

Experience

Graduate Research Assistant

Aug 2022 – Aug 2026

University of Florida · Agricultural and Biological Engineering

  • Own the full stack of a cross-system agricultural data platform, smart contracts, REST APIs, data pipelines, web UI, shipped solo and used in funded-project demonstrations.
  • Built distributed-ledger backends on Hyperledger Fabric (Go) with Node.js/Express service layers, delivering sub-5s trace queries across 8,000+ linked records.
  • Designed ingestion and verification pipelines using Airflow jobs, Kafka event streams, and Spark batch aggregations over file-level metadata.
  • Delivered reproducible documentation and demo code adopted by external collaborators without direct handoff.

Researcher

2024 – 2025

Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), South Korea

Delivered a comparative analysis of crop mechanization and digital-agriculture adoption between South Korea and the United States, used for cross-country technology and policy benchmarking.

Researcher

2019 – 2022

Billion21

  • Built production-facing computer-vision pipelines (YOLO, SAM, OpenCV) for marine monitoring and automated feeding, reducing manual inspection effort in live aquaculture operations.
  • Contributed detection and segmentation components that fed into two filed patents on blockchain-tracked seaweed farming and spore selection.

Researcher

2020 – 2021

Global BioAg Linkages

Scoped technical and data requirements for AI deployment in agricultural production systems, informing design decisions for downstream pilot projects.

Undergraduate Research Assistant

2021 – 2022

Texas Tech University

Shipped reusable computer-vision and data-visualization components adopted by subsequent lab projects.

Police Officer (Auxiliary)

2018 – 2019

Gyeonggi Nambu Provincial Police Agency, South Korea

Personnel and training administration. Recognized at the 74th National Police Day ceremony.

Projects

Data Infrastructure

1 DEMETER: Data Sharing and Verification Platform Hyperledger Fabric · Go · Node.js · Airflow · Kafka · Spark · Docker · LLM

Agricultural data has significant value for farm decisions, environmental assessment, and regulatory compliance, but sharing it across independent organizations rarely happens because no organization can confirm where an outside file came from. A central database would solve this, but no single organization has the infrastructure to collect and maintain all agricultural data. Files get sent directly, and the moment a file leaves one system, its history is lost.

DEMETER addresses this by recording file history on a shared blockchain while files remain on each organization's local system. Three layers handle what is lost when files cross boundaries: where a file came from (origin), how it was changed (transformation), and how it was shared (integration). A natural language interface lets users query and write records through plain-text commands.

DEMETER system flow
Architecture: LLM interface, Origin/Transformation/Integration on-chain, Tracing, files remain off-chain

The full system was designed and built end-to-end.

DEMETER network
Hyperledger Fabric network: 4 organizations, shared ledger, no central authority
Chaincode3 Go contracts, 19 exported functions (Dataset, Transform, Reuse)
Backend API37 REST endpoints across 8 route modules (Node.js/Express)
Frontend7 pages (Next.js 15, TypeScript, React Flow for provenance graphs)
NLQ15 intents, deterministic routing + Phi-3 LLM fallback via Ollama
DID AuthECDSA P-256 key pair, Web Crypto API, challenge-response
Local AgentWatches a folder, auto-detects provenance type, registers on-chain
Data PipelinesAirflow jobs, Kafka event streams, Spark batch aggregations over ledger history
DeploymentHyperledger Fabric v2.5, Docker Compose, Raft ordering, CI-driven build and test

Evaluation tested 5 claims across 4 independently operated systems, confirming all requirements (R1–R6) under both functional and failure conditions.

Evaluation results
All 5 claims PASS: origin inspectable, transformation traceable, integration decomposable, unverified source flagged, NLQ zero false writes
Provenance trace
19-node trace across 5 depths in 0.84s. Queries under 5s up to 8,000 linked records

As a general-purpose bottom layer, DEMETER is currently being extended to soil spectrum and mapping data, fresh food to waste management, and smart aquaculture with edge computing. Future work includes pagination-based tracing beyond 8,000 records and AI agent interfaces for automated verification workflows.

Code: github.com/WhoisHOO/DEMETER (private during review)
Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. DEMETER: An infrastructure for verification-traceable reuse of agricultural data across decentralized environments. Under review.

2 Natural Language Query Interface Phi-3 · Ollama · Node.js

Users interacting with a blockchain-based data system should not need to learn API endpoints or command syntax, but agricultural data sharing does not require deep reasoning from an LLM, it requires accurate intent classification and correct routing to the right operation.

This natural language interface classifies user input into 15 intents and routes each to the correct DEMETER operation. Deterministic keyword matching handles known patterns; Phi-3 (3.8B) via Ollama handles the rest, running locally with no external API dependency.

The keyword router checks input against predefined patterns first, and unmatched queries fall through to Phi-3 for intent classification. A write confirmation gate prevents unintended ledger modifications, any operation that writes to the blockchain requires explicit user approval.

A 74-case evaluation suite covering all 15 intents and edge cases confirmed 100% routing accuracy and zero false writes.

3 Scalable Blockchain-Based Traceability for Agricultural Imagery Hyperledger Fabric · IPFS · Node.js

Existing blockchain frameworks store static data references (e.g., IPFS hashes) on-chain, but every transformation generates a new hash, fragmenting the traceability chain and increasing storage redundancy. Agricultural image files such as drone TIFF and satellite imagery are large and frequently transformed through NDVI analysis, yield estimation, and crop growth monitoring, and current models cannot handle this volume without excessive on-chain storage.

Data branching and transformation
The problem: agricultural data branches and transforms across farmers, storage, transportation, and consumers

This scalable traceability framework applies DV-TI infrastructure to citrus drone imagery from Immokalee, FL. Instead of logging every transformation as a new on-chain entry, a dynamic hashing ID mechanism updates when data is transformed, maintaining continuous traceability while reducing storage overhead. IPFS handles large file storage off-chain; the blockchain stores only IDs and metadata.

Blockchain-IPFS system
System architecture: blockchain ledgers + IPFS for citrus drone imagery with NDVI, disease monitoring, irrigation, and crop growth data

The smart contract logs every data interaction, uploads, access requests, transformations, downloads, and usage events, and each interaction generates a unique hashing ID that optimizes transaction speed and prevents redundant on-chain storage. Testing applied predefined criteria (data type, size, timestamp, geolocation) on citrus farm imagery.

All user activities were successfully recorded on-chain with timestamps, user IDs, and access roles converted into secure hash values. The hashing ID update mechanism significantly reduced redundant storage compared to conventional blockchain-IPFS models, confirming the system handles real-world scalability demands while preserving data integrity.

Future directions include a common Ag-Blockchain API enabling data transformation and interoperability across farm management, food traceability, and sustainability applications, along with Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKP) to verify and track off-chain data modifications while maintaining privacy.

Proposed API framework
Proposed framework: Common API connecting blockchain operator, auditors, Hyperledger Fabric, Node.js server, and end users
4 SI, Source Integration for Agricultural Data Sharing Go · Hyperledger Fabric · CouchDB

When multiple files from different organizations are combined into a single output, the downstream party cannot determine which source files contributed or under what license conditions they were shared.

This infrastructure governs how files move between organizations and how combined outputs relate back to their sources, recording every access request, approval, transfer, and reuse decision on-chain.

The access request workflow runs through Request, Approve, Fulfill, and Download, while reuse evaluation checks purpose against 7 Creative Commons license types with expiration enforcement and derivative restrictions. A decision chain tracing audits who approved what and when.

Code: github.com/WhoisHOO/demeter-si-infrastructure (private during review)
Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. Under review.

5 TI, Transformation Integrity for Agricultural Data Sharing Go · Hyperledger Fabric · SHA-256

When a file is transformed into a new file (e.g., raw sensor data into a loss appraisal), the new file has different content and a different fingerprint. The downstream party cannot determine which input was used or what operation was performed, because that information exists only inside the producing party's system.

This infrastructure lets a downstream party determine the declared registered input and declared operation for a transformed file using only the shared ledger, without contacting the producing environment.

The processor writes a declaration to the ledger linking input File ID to output File ID with an operation label, and declarations referencing unregistered inputs are rejected. Inspection follows the chain backward and returns one of three states: resolved, resolved with gap, or no declaration.

Importantly, TI verifies the consistency of a transformation declaration, not the correctness of the transformation process itself. This boundary keeps infrastructure-level claims honest: the system records what was declared, not whether the operation produced a semantically correct result.

Validation used a two-stage chain (farmer registers, ATP-A transforms, ATP-B transforms again). The downstream party retrieves the full chain in one query, and declaration-time validation correctly rejects unregistered inputs.

Code: github.com/WhoisHOO/demeter-ti-infrastructure (private during review)
Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. An Infrastructure for Determining the Declared Registered Input and Operation for a Transformed Agricultural File. Under review.

6 DV, File Origin Verification for Agricultural Data Sharing Go · Hyperledger Fabric · SHA-256

When a farmer sends a file to an advisor, and the advisor sends it to a certifier, the certifier has no way to check whether the file matches what the farmer originally recorded. The farmer's computer may be off, and no shared record connects them.

This infrastructure lets any downstream receiver verify whether a file has the same content as the version recorded before the first transfer, and reconstruct the full sequence of senders and receivers, without contacting any earlier computer.

A SHA-256 fingerprint is computed at registration and stored on the shared ledger, and each transfer is recorded as a linked entry. Verification recomputes the fingerprint from the file in hand and compares it against the ledger, while transfer tracing follows linked records backward to the origin.

Verification was confirmed across multi-hop transfers: modified files correctly fail verification (different fingerprint, no matching record), and tracing reconstructs the full path regardless of whether intermediate parties are online.

Code: github.com/WhoisHOO/demeter-dv-infrastructure (private during review)
Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. An Infrastructure for Agricultural File Origin Verification and Transfer Tracing. Under review.

7 Cross-Sectoral Review of Blockchain in Data Sharing Agriculture · Healthcare · Finance

Before designing the infrastructure, it was necessary to understand what has been done across sectors and what gaps remain. Agriculture is not the only field where data crosses organizational boundaries.

This cross-sectoral review analyzed blockchain applications in data sharing across agriculture, healthcare, and finance, identifying what each sector has implemented (origin, transformation, integration) and where gaps remain.

An important distinction often conflated in the agricultural blockchain literature emerged from the review: supply-chain traceability tracks products, while data-file traceability tracks the origin, transfer, and transformation of data objects. Identifying this distinction was essential for defining the scope of verification infrastructure.

Agriculture had partial origin verification but no transformation or integration traceability, healthcare had implemented origin, and finance had implemented origin and transformation. No sector had all three, which established DV, TI, and SI as the three necessary layers.

Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. Facilitating a Future Agricultural Data Ecosystem. Under review.

8 Blockchain-Based Seaweed Supply Chain Tracking Blockchain · Smart Contract

Seaweed (laver) farming in South Korea involves spore cultivation, harvesting, processing, and distribution across multiple independent parties. Each stage generates distinct data, spore density judgments at cultivation, harvest yield at recovery, processing conditions and batch records at the mill, and distribution paths between wholesalers and retailers, yet no shared system connects producers, processors, and distributors. Once a product leaves one party's system, the data needed for quality assurance and regulatory compliance is lost.

This blockchain-based data management system records production data, processing events, and distribution transfers on a shared ledger so that any downstream party can trace the full history of a seaweed product from spore cultivation through final delivery. Applying blockchain at this layer guarantees three properties the supply chain previously lacked: diversity across participating parties, security against tampering, and transparency for auditors and regulators.

The system builds directly on the laver spore selection patent (KR102034354B1), which established automated image-based quality assessment at the cultivation stage. Spore density judgments produced by that imaging pipeline become the first verifiable record on the ledger, and each downstream stage (harvest, processing, distribution) appends linked records referencing that origin.

Patent Application KR10-2024-0011399, 2024. Status: Pending.

9 Agricultural Machinery Data Analysis Data Analysis · Comparative Study

Building data infrastructure for agriculture requires understanding what the data looks like. Modern agricultural machinery generates field data with specific characteristics, formats, and constraints that vary by crop and region.

These comparative studies of mechanization and cultivation patterns between the US and South Korea analyzed potato, sweet potato, and Chinese cabbage, examining how machinery data is produced, structured, and used in practice across different farming systems.

Sourced by: Kim, J.H., Cho, Y., et al. (2024–2025). Journal of Biosystems Engineering. 3 papers.

10 Carbon Markets & Agricultural Data Sharing Stakeholder Analysis · Policy

Carbon credits, insurance indemnity, and compliance decisions all depend on data that crosses organizational boundaries. If the downstream party cannot verify where the data came from, the decision rests on unverifiable claims.

This comparative study of stakeholder engagement in carbon markets between South Korea and the United States established why a data sharing perspective is necessary in agriculture and where verifiable infrastructure is missing.

Sourced by: Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2025). Discover Agriculture, 3, 126.

Ongoing DEMETER Applications In Progress
  • Soil Spectrum & Soil Mapping, cross-organizational verification and sharing of soil spectrum and mapping data
  • Fresh Food to Waste Management, supply chain data traceability from production to waste
  • Smart Aquaculture & Edge Computing, inland fishery systems with perception, edge computing, and networked data sharing

Applied AI & Data

1 AI Aquaculture System YOLO · SAM · Python · OpenCV

Marine fish farms rely on manual observation for feeding decisions and growth assessment, which is labor-intensive, inconsistent, and cannot scale across large production environments with multiple species.

At BILLION21, I built the computer vision components for the company's smart aquaculture system, targeting two tasks that manual observation could not handle consistently: whole-population behavior analysis and individual-level size estimation for olive flounder and stone flounder. The feeding control logic, edge hardware, and feeder mechanisms were developed by other teams at the company; my contribution was the vision signals those downstream modules depended on.

YOLO handled population-level behavior detection, tracking movement patterns across the tank to inform feeding decisions. SAM handled individual-level segmentation, producing size estimates for growth monitoring. Both models were tuned for real farm imaging conditions rather than research datasets.

The components were deployed in real production environments and contributed to BILLION21's commercial product development. The operational data such systems generate, feeding logs, growth time series, and environmental sensor traces, is precisely what the DEMETER smart-aquaculture extension (see ongoing applications above) is being built to verify and share across parties.

This experience shaped a principle that guides my infrastructure work: the key challenge in agricultural technology is not applying the newest method, but building systems that operate reliably under real production constraints.

2 Laver Spore Selection System Computer Vision · Machine Learning · Microscopy

In Korean laver farming, spores are cultivated in water tanks and implanted onto nets wrapped around rotating frames. Verifying whether enough spores have attached to each net section determines harvest readiness, but this was done entirely by hand and eye, limiting efficiency and consistency across large-scale operations.

This automated spore sorting system uses a camera device (biological microscope with mercury lamp) mounted on the harvesting apparatus to photograph spores. Images are transmitted to a central control terminal that measures spore density and determines planting completeness, above threshold the net section is selected for harvest, below threshold it is re-cultivated.

Laver harvesting apparatus 3D view
Harvesting apparatus: water tank (100), rotating frame with net (10, 20), imaging device (30), shells with spores (1)
System architecture
System architecture: Harvesting device (100) connects to imaging device (30) with three modules, camera (32), wireless communication (34), and controller (36), which transmits to the central management center (200) for analysis
Process flowchart
Selection flowchart: S100 Rotate frame → S110 Harvest spores from shells → S120 Photograph spores with imaging device → S130 Transmit image to control center → S140 Spore density above threshold? If yes → S150 Select net section for harvest. If no → return to S100 and re-cultivate

The control center database accumulates image data of completed plantings and builds a machine learning model from that data, automating verification that was previously manual.

Patent KR102034354B1, 2019. Status: Granted. Google Patents

3 Biological Systems Modeling Python · NetLogo · Java · Agent-Based

Understanding how biological and environmental systems behave over time is foundational for building data infrastructure that serves those systems, since models reveal what data matters and how it changes.

A three-course series (ABE 5643C, ABE 6649C, ABE 6933) covered dynamic systems modeling, agent-based modeling, and advanced simulation, producing computational models of predator-prey dynamics, crop growth, and ecological processes. Certificate in Biological Systems Modeling.

4 Citrus Tree Trunk Segmentation PyTorch · CNN · Segmentation

Automated identification of tree trunks in citrus groves supports precision spraying, canopy management, and yield estimation, reducing manual field assessment.

This CNN-based image segmentation pipeline for citrus tree trunks was implemented end-to-end from data preparation through model training and inference using PyTorch (ABE 6933).

5 Precision Agriculture & SmartAg GPS/GIS · UAV · IoT · ML

Precision agriculture systems generate high-volume field data from GPS, sensors, drones, and IoT devices. Knowing how this data is produced and used is essential for building infrastructure that can handle it.

Coursework covered advanced precision agriculture methods, GPS/GIS, remote sensing, UAV, variable rate technology, and IoT sensor networks, and applied them in SmartAg systems spanning instrumentation, machine learning, and control methods for real agricultural applications.

6 Food & Bioprocess Engineering Process Design · Data Management

Food processing generates data at every stage, from sterilization temperatures to fermentation rates. Understanding these processes is necessary to design data infrastructure that captures what matters in food supply chains.

Coursework covered engineering design of unit process operations in agro/food, pharmaceutical, and biological industries, sterilization, pasteurization, drying, evaporation, fermentation, and distillation, connecting AI and data management to physical food processing systems.

7 Applied Detection, Classification & Recognition TensorFlow · YOLO · CNN · Audio ML

During undergraduate research at Texas Tech, I applied ML models to real-world datasets across different domains to build hands-on experience with end-to-end pipelines for detection, classification, and recognition tasks across three modalities:

Publications

Papers

  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. DEMETER: An infrastructure for verification-traceable reuse of agricultural data across decentralized environments. Under review.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. An infrastructure for agricultural file origin verification and transfer tracing. Under review.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. An infrastructure for determining the declared registered input and operation for a transformed agricultural file. Under review.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. Facilitating a future agricultural data ecosystem: A cross-sectoral review of blockchain application in data sharing. Under review.
  • Zhang, C., Guzman, S., Judge, J., Zhuang, Y., Zhao, C., Cho, Y., & Yu, Z. (2026). Event-based decentralized approach of root zone soil moisture increase dynamics. Air, Soil and Water Research, 19, 1–23.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2025). Bridging carbon markets and agriculture: A comparative study of stakeholder engagement in South Korea and United States. Discover Agriculture, 3, 126.
  • Kim, J.H.†, Cho, Y.H.†, Hwang, I.S., Shin, C.S., & Nam, J.S. (2025). A comparative review of mechanization status and cultivation pattern of Chinese cabbage in the USA and South Korea. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 50, 393–409.
  • Kim, J.H.†, Cho, Y.H.†, Kim, K.M., Lee, C.Y., Lee, W.S., & Nam, J.S. (2025). Sweet potato farming in the USA and South Korea: A comparative study of cultivation pattern and mechanization status. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 50(2), 210–224.
  • Jang, M.K., Kim, S.J., Cho, Y.H., & Nam, J.S. (2025). Prediction model of PTO shaft fatigue damage considering sandy loam and loam in rotary-tillage operation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 56(2).
  • Kim, J.H.†, Lee, C.Y.†, Cho, Y.H.†, Yu, Z., Kim, K.M., Yang, Y.J., & Nam, J.S. (2024). Potato farming in the United States and South Korea: Status comparison of cultivation patterns and agricultural machinery use. Journal of Biosystems Engineering, 49(3), 252–269.

† Equal contribution

Patents

  • Cho, B., & Cho, Y. (2024). Efficient seaweed farming data management by utilizing blockchain and smart supply chain tracking system for seaweed products using the same. Korean Patent Application KR10-2024-0011399, filed January 25, 2024. Status: Pending.
  • Cho, B., & Cho, Y. (2019). Methods for selecting spores from laver farm devices. Korean Patent KR102034354B1. Status: Granted. Google Patents

Conference Presentations

  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2025, July 15). Enhancing trust in agriculture: Addressing data sharing with blockchain technology. ASABE 2025 Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Canada.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., Ampatzidis, Y., & Nam, J. (2025, April 25). Cross-sectoral analysis of data traceability in agriculture, healthcare, and finance. KSAM 2025 Spring Conference, Jeonju, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., Ampatzidis, Y., & Nam, J. (2024, May 22). Blockchain-enhanced data management and integrity in smart agriculture. CIGR Conference, Jeju-do, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., & Ampatzidis, Y. (2024, April 15–17). Blockchain-enhanced data management in AI-driven agriculture. 3rd Annual AI in Agriculture and Natural Resources Conference, College Station, TX.
  • Cho, Y., Yu, Z., Ampatzidis, Y., Wu, S., & Zhang, C. (2024, July 28–31). Blockchain innovation for transparent forest carbon markets. ASABE Annual International Meeting, Anaheim, CA.
  • Cho, Y. (2023, April 17). Solving the trust issue in digital commodity market in agriculture. AI in Agriculture Conference, Orlando, FL.
  • Cho, Y. (2023, July 11). A pathway to address trust issues in digital commodities in agriculture: blockchain. ASABE 2023 Annual International Meeting, Omaha, NE.

Peer Review

Reviewer for 5 journals (2024–Present):

  • Environmental, Development and Sustainability (Springer Nature)
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (Springer Nature)
  • Discover Agriculture (Springer Nature)
  • Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (Springer Nature)
  • Sustainable Futures (Elsevier)

Teaching

My teaching approach is problem-first: start with an operational scenario in plain language, then introduce the tools needed to address it. Students build intuition before formalism, and learn to identify what is missing, design what is needed, and evaluate whether it works.

Supervised Teaching

2024 – 2026

University of Florida · Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

  • Developed course modules on AI and data systems for ABE 6933 Agent-Based Modeling for Biological Systems, Dr. Gregory Kiker (Summer 2024)
  • Guest lecture for AOM 5456 Applied Methods in SmartAg Systems, Dr. Ziwen Yu (2026)

Invited Lectures & Seminars

  • Cho, Y. (2025, May 28). Designing research pathways from real-world problems. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2025, May 21). Building trustworthy data infrastructure for digital agriculture. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2025, June 21). Digital agriculture and aquaculture enabled by blockchain technology. BILLION21 Inc., Gunpo, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2024, May 16). Data trends in agriculture and aquaculture in the United States. Korea National University of Agriculture and Fisheries, Jeonju, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2024, June 10). Emerging trends in digital and smart agriculture for greenhouse systems. Jeonju University, Jeonju, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2024, June 14). Emerging trends in digital and smart agriculture for agricultural machinery. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2024, June 20). Digital and smart agriculture for open-field production systems. Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, South Korea.
  • Cho, Y. (2024, June 24). Smart agriculture trends for upland crop production. Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea.

PUSH4IT Coach

2025 – 2026

Office of Academic Support (OASIS), University of Florida

Coach in the PUSH4IT peer coaching program, helping students develop academic strategies, time management, and goal-setting skills to support on-time graduation.

Graduate Student Mentor

2023 – 2024

ABE Mentoring Program, University of Florida

Mentored undergraduate students in data-driven agriculture through the ABE department's peer mentoring program.

Online Developer Mentoring

2019 – Present

HOOAI Blog

Technical blog with 790+ posts covering Python, C/C++, AI, blockchain, and algorithms. Mentoring students on graduate school preparation, career guidance, and coding interview prep.

Proposed Courses

  • Data Infrastructure for Agricultural Systems — Verification, traceability, and governance in cross-organizational data sharing. Designing systems that track data origin, transfer, and transformation using distributed ledger technology and APIs.
  • Applied Blockchain and Smart Contracts for Agriculture — Blockchain architecture, smart contract design (Hyperledger Fabric), and applications in supply chain transparency, carbon credit verification, and data provenance.
  • AI and Machine Learning for Agricultural Applications — Hands-on course covering computer vision (YOLO, SAM, OpenCV), applied ML, and LLM integration for agricultural monitoring and decision support under real production constraints.
  • Data Science and Programming for Agricultural Engineering — Python-based course on data manipulation, statistical analysis, API development, database management, and data visualization.
  • Smart Agriculture Systems Engineering — IoT architectures, sensor networks, edge computing, and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure) for agricultural monitoring, from field-level sensors to decision support systems.
  • Digital Agriculture Seminar — Graduate seminar on data governance, cross-sectoral interoperability, trustworthy AI pipelines, and infrastructure challenges in scaling digital systems across diverse agricultural contexts.

Grants & Awards

  • 2025. University of Florida, IFAS, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Top-up Grant.
  • 2025. University of Florida, IFAS, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Travel Grant.
  • 2025. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Republic of Korea). International Research Travel Grant.
  • 2024. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (Republic of Korea). International Research Travel Grant.
  • 2024. International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR). Travel Grant.
  • 2024. University of Florida, IFAS, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. Top-up Grant.
  • 2023. University of Florida Graduate Student Council. Travel Grant.
  • 2022. Research Fellowship. Enhancing Trust in Partnerships within Digital Farming.

Community

Charitable Giving

2019 – Present

via Kakao Together

Supporting programs for vulnerable children, youth aging out of foster care, and communities affected by crisis in South Korea.

Contact

  • Email: younghoo.cho@ufl.edu
  • GitHub: WhoisHOO
  • LinkedIn: Younghoo Cho
  • ORCID: 0009-0009-7406-1782
  • CV: Download (PDF)
  • Work Authorization: F-1 student visa. Eligible for 12-month OPT plus 24-month STEM OPT extension (36 months total) upon graduation in 2026. Planning to apply for EB-2 NIW (National Interest Waiver), so visa sponsorship from the employer is not required.

Advisors & References

  • Dr. Ziwen Yu, Committee Chair, Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida
  • Dr. Yiannis Ampatzidis, Committee Member, Professor of Precision Agriculture and Smart Machines, Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, University of Florida
  • Dr. Sabine Grunwald, Committee Member, Professor of Pedometrics, Landscape Analysis and GIS, Department of Soil, Water, and Ecosystem Sciences, University of Florida